Everything you plan to build, security-reviewed before the code exists.

Rayz turns what your team plans to build into security requirements and owned tasks, checked against your policies and frameworks.

Security gaps don’t stay cheap to fix.

The longer a gap goes unaddressed, the more time, cost, and complexity it takes to close.

TIME
Fixing a gap during design takes minutes. Fixing it after release means stopping other work, investigating, patching, and re-testing.
COST
Address it at design, and it costs nothing extra to build. Find it once it’s already in the codebase, and fixing it takes longer: the code has to be rewritten, not just written right the first time.
COMPLEXITY
Early on, a gap is isolated and easy to change. Once code ships, other features are built on top of it, and fixing it means touching all of them.

How a single change flows through Rayz

From the design doc your team already writes, to a recorded security decision. Every task cited against your own policy.

  1. 01

    The design comes in

    Rayz picks up the design from where the team documents it, with its linked pages and attachments.

  2. 02

    The review is written

    Threats, security requirements and tasks, each citing the clause of your policy or the framework it comes from.

  3. 03

    Tasks reach their owners

    Every task lands in the tracker with an owner and a priority, plus a block the developer can hand to their coding agent.

  4. 04

    Security decides

    A security member approves or declines, tasks are closed or waived with a reason, and every decision is recorded.

Security that keeps up with the sprint.

Unify security, product, and engineering into one continuous workflow, from design to production.

Security and engineering in sync

Requirements surface while architecture is being designed, with shared ownership through deployment.

Your standards, on every change

Reviews check each change against your own security policies as well as SOC 2, ISO 27001 and the rest, and cite the section a task satisfies. A one-line config change and a new service are held to the same bar.

Decided before release

Every task is closed or waived by a security member, with the reason on record, so the release gate is a decision rather than a conversation.

An audit trail you didn't assemble

Every decision keeps its reasoning, owner, and date. The questions auditors ask are already answered.

Two sides of the release. One record of the change.

Security sets the bar, engineering ships against it, and both work from the same review.

PRODUCT SECURITY

Baselines that hold.

Set the bar once, with your own policies alongside the frameworks, and see every change measured against it.

SECURITY ENGINEER

Risk assessed early.

Guide architecture and validate requirements pre-release instead of chasing them after.

PRODUCT MANAGER

No surprise blockers.

Requirements arrive with the sprint, not after it, written for the change your team is actually making.

DEVELOPER

Clear tasks in your tracker.

Requirements written for this change, with the criteria that closes them, in the existing workflow.

ENGINEERING MANAGER

Release dates that hold.

Security work is sized with the sprint instead of arriving as a late blocker, so the plan survives the review.

Plans that scale with your team.

FREE
$0

For one team trying secure design review on real changes. No card, no time limit.

1 workspaceUp to 3 members5 reviews / monthJira, Confluence and Slack
Create account
ENTERPRISE
Custom

Unlimited usage, dedicated support and contract terms that fit your procurement.

Unlimited workspaces, members and reviewsDedicated support and custom terms
Book a demo
EVERY PLAN INCLUDESProduct change context captureYour internal policies and regulatory frameworksRequirements written per changeTasks with owner, priority and statusDecisions and waivers on recordCross-functional reporting

Prices exclude tax. Cancel any time; access continues to the end of the billing period. Billing terms

Questions security teams ask first.

What do we get from a review?

A threat model for the change, the security requirements it must meet with the policy or framework clause each one comes from, and a task per requirement with an owner, a priority and a block your developers can hand to their coding agent.

Is this AI, and who decides?

The review is generated by AI from your design and your policies, in minutes. A security member on your team approves or declines, and that decision is what the record shows.

Does Rayz need access to our code or systems?

No. Reviews work from the design you paste, upload or import from Confluence. Jira access is used only to create and sync tasks.

How is this different from GRC tooling?

GRC platforms record what already happened. Rayz acts at planning time, while a control still costs a sentence instead of a sprint.

Is every decision recorded, even if we change our mind?

Yes. Approvals, declines, waivers with their reasons, and any later reversal are logged to the review’s activity history, and the whole record exports as a PDF.

How long does setup take?

Paste your first design and read the review the same afternoon. Connect Jira when you want tasks in your tracker.

Govern your next release before it ships.

Free for one team. No card, no time limit.